🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had come from intermediaries to reopen talks with the Trump administration. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Route

Araghchi is treading a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the US president asserting the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, EU nations employed their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be revived in certain ways if talks resume.

Trump last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Position

In his speech to the forum, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be settled by military means. He stated the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith hard to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had always attempted to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the final resolution to settle conflicts, but its criteria, rules and principles must be followed."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and respect, they will obtain a reply in the identical approach."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the face of this assault."